- #Can i use newblue titler pro 5 with magix movie edit pro install#
- #Can i use newblue titler pro 5 with magix movie edit pro upgrade#
It still in my eyes the best value for money (the ultimate upgrade versions). The reason for (still) following/upgrading Corel video Studio is purely nostalgic as I started with editing with this NLE long time ago, and know it quite well. I did not like pinnacle, and powerdirector crashed to much. I have both products MEP and VPX (and Vegas pro 13 and 14) and all versions of Corel VS ultimate (and even pinnacle and cyberlink power director). MEP was much simpler and straight forward to use.once I got used to it. No such thing in MEP - you almost always stay on the timeline. I kept looking for things like the Editor screen in Pinnacle. I had trouble at first understanding MEP because the workflow was quite different. I still kept it up even after Corel took over and I'm at version 18.6. Once you get familiar with a certain way of working, it is usually always the "best." I came from Pinnacle Studio several years ago to MEP when it looked like Avid was throwing in the towel and the future of Pinnacle looked bleak.
#Can i use newblue titler pro 5 with magix movie edit pro install#
In VPX, make sure that you download the extra content under Help, Install extra content, after activating.Īs far as work flow goes, each user likes what he is used to. Post on the forum for VPX and here for Vegas.
Ask questions if you can't find certain features in one program that you have in the other. Unfortunately, it takes a lot of time and effort to find everything, so give each product a good shot. Make your choice based on the features that you need overall, ease of working, user-friendliness (if that is possible in an nle) and stability. In VPX, track 1 is the bottom of the pile, whereas in Vegas it is on the top. Take note of my other post about the features and in particular the difference in the way that tracks are handled. So we should not expect that transitions are superior in terms of quality both products. All the MVC encoder in the price class of both tools are limited in the data rate due to licence costs. My impresson at the time of testing was that render quality was quite similar. In terms of render quality - well, since I have not tested the latest version of VPX that is hard to assess too. My tests were some time ago, so I cannot assess how the number of crashes are in the today versions. Overall, the s3D interface in Vegas Pro had a better logic in my eyes, compared to the tools of VPX (everything can be done in the s3D interface in Vegas, for VPX it was necessary to switch between menus).
The keyframing was better, the autocroping after the stereoscopic adjustment were better. When I tested Vegas Pro versus VPX for s3D reasons, I came to the conclusion that Vegas is more superior in terms of s3D. Which tool has the lower number of bugs? (crashes etc.) It seems that the 3D (stereoscopic) transitions are better in Magix Video Pro X. Which tool is best to create 3D stereoscopic slideshows (to generate an MVC file 2 X 1920X1080, frame sequential)? Vegas Pro or Magix Video Pro X?
0 kommentar(er)
